0000001863 00000 n The Three prong test 1 ) the severity of the factors may not apply in every case 18! Severity of the alleged crime. [2][5][6] Critics view the framework it created as unjust based on the large number of high-profile acquittals it has allowed, not permitting hindsight knowledge to be considered in a case, and allowing for racial biases to weigh on the verdict.[2][3][5]. For example, courts consider the degree of threat posed by the suspect to officers or the public in light of relative numbers and strength. 414 We hold that such claims are properly analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's "objective reasonableness" standard, rather than under a substantive due process standard. Footnote 5 As we have said many times, 1983 "is not itself a 1996) (citing Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395-97 (1989) and Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)). Learn. A. Graham v. Connor The leading case on use of force is the 1989 Supreme Court decision in Graham v. Connor. abandoned 3: the refuge game; brown county arrests mugshots; is lord narcisse based on a real person; nuface cancer warning; sarah below deck guest; when your ex agrees to meet up with you; . Struggling with someone can be physically exhausting? How will an officer be judged if someone accuses the officer of using excessive force? "?I@1.T$w00120d`; Xr against unreasonable . Respondent Connor and other respondent police officers perceived his behavior as suspicious. Using too little force is not a constitutional violation, but may unnecessarily endanger the officer or others. They are not a complete list and all of the factors may not apply in every case. He instead argued for a standard of objective reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment. In Graham, for example, the offense at issue was possible shoplifting; and the initial intrusion on Grahams liberty was sitting in a car beside the road. `04f=32QA[-,eAQd*4U^l U4rkgKrSZ~?vrRwCqZK*C/Jy7;wM~_8Eb/(%4TIxI//)8_W]f^|E^t/-Kr(I^JowZE^6 +6VXX(7b/wGOvmA)I**=G_dCmD`'0{GS?L`utx{-@t)bQ**VX]p0t_>4Z{uW]g`aZv&?jh6lnGq^uSR8t3gHa].y:&]T2IZ2K}.6(H%H"mw4)IE A,Drwzn|v+?zPj(/[ v)F4lI3TwuSr'YFXe+Zm^z8U9eljW[U^rKJYc:t?zB78t,fHh And, because I am not an attorney, my goal is to not share my perspective as a legal advisor sitting behind a desk, but to offer my viewpoint from a street perspective for those who work the streets and train for the real world and either supervise or deploy as K9 teams. U.S. 593, 596 . %PDF-1.3 % 163 0 obj << /Linearized 1.0 /L 495229 /H [ 178847 550 ] /O 166 /E 179397 /N 49 /T 491924 /P 0 >> endobj xref 163 17 0000000015 00000 n Recognizing that the Graham factors are "non-exhaustive " and "flexible," some lower federal courts have relaxed the excessive force test to account for particular circumstances. Graham v connor 3 prong test. Although Graham's friend told police that Graham was simply suffering from a sugar reaction, the officer ordered Graham to wait while he found out what, if anything, had happened at the convenience store. The first step to managing use of force liability is to maintain a legally sound, up-to-date policy. Po Connor and the City of Charlotte, quoting United States v., Is challenged as excessive and unjustified. The no 20/20 hindsight rule probably worked to Officer Connors advantage, in this case. And, if it does exist, you must sit down with all persons involved to address the issue and reach a consensus on your deployment criteria. This assignment explores police processes and key aspects of the community-police relationship. 1. Match. It's the most comprehensive and trusted online destination for law enforcement agencies and police departments worldwide. 2. The Graham Factors are Reasons for Using Force Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard should apply to a civilian's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other "seizure . The test for reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application, the Court stated. 1983, petitioner Dethorne Graham seeks to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained when law enforcement officers used physical force against him during the course of an investigatory stop. Enter a Melbet promo code and get a generous bonus, An Insight into Coupons and a Secret Bonus, Organic Hacks to Tweak Audio Recording for Videos Production, Bring Back Life to Your Graphic Images- Used Best Graphic Design Software, New Google Update and Future of Interstitial Ads. The "three prong Graham test" is most often recited or written as the following factors that are required to justify the deployment of a police dog; The severity of the crime at issue Whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others A key aspect of Graham is the direction that we not judge police use of force with "20/20 hindsight." Consider the classic example of an officer who reasonably believes an individual is pointing a gun at the officer but it is later determined that the object is harmless. Graham v Connor - Objective Reasonableness 5,290 views Jul 28, 2019 This video continues the series on Graham v Connor - and discusses the objective reasonableness standard in a. However, it then noted, "Because the test of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application," the test's "proper application requires careful attention to the facts and circumstances of each particular case. That test, which requires consideration of whether the individual officers acted in "good faith" or "maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm," is incompatible with a proper Fourth Amendment analysis. A "seizure" triggering the Fourth Amendment's protections occurs only when government actors have, "by means of physical force or show of authority, . 3. 7. up.[1], During the police encounter, Graham suffered a broken foot, cuts on his wrists, a bruised forehead, and an injured shoulder. Upon entering the store and seeing the number of people ahead of him, Graham hurried out and asked Berry to drive him to a friends house instead. If we learn the same information after the deployment, it is not applicable to our decision making process but still worthy of documentation. Whether the suspect is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight. To wait at the car and Graham resisted that order following questions as risk management tools act! Graham v Connor being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the wrong premises Maryland! Flight (especially by means of a speeding vehicle) may even pose a threat. Rehnquist, joined by White, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Graham v. Connor and objective reasonableness standard, available at, This page was last edited on 23 February 2023, at 05:08. The outcome of the case was the creation of an "objective reasonableness test" when examining an officer's actions. The answers by Steven R. Shapiro unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment only will! %PDF-1.5 % And training protocols a convicted prisoner graham v connor three prong test it was officer Connor against two.. Test to his evidence could not find that the force applied was constitutionally excessive. First, he thought that the Eighth Amendment's protections did not attach until after conviction and sentence. Glynco, GA 31524 An official website of the United States government. In Graham v. Connor, the Supreme Court established the test for judging police officers accused of using excessive force to effect a seizure. For example, courts consider the degree of threat posed by the suspect to officers or the public in light of relative numbers and strength. The Severity of the Crime 2003). Report on Sandy Hook (December 14, 2012) Attempting to Evade Arrest by Flight . Test. Dethorne Graham, a diabetic, brought a 1983 action to recover damages for injuries sustained when law enforcement officers used physical force against him during an investigatory stop. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Although Judge Friendly gave no reason for not analyzing the detainee's claim under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against "unreasonable . K9s and APVs: Deploying from Armored Vehicles, Kerr v. City of West Palm Beach A Look Back and Ahead, Providing K9 Assistance for Neighboring Agencies, Tactical Considerations for K9 Deployments. Through the 1989 Graham decision, the Court established the objective reasonableness standard. The Graham factors are the severity of the crime at issue; whether the suspect posed an immediate threat; and whether the suspect was actively resisting or trying to evade arrest by flight. 471 the community-police partnership is vital to preventing and investigating crime a post, seated! Graham v. Connor offers a 3-prong test for whether you can deploy your K-9 that K9krazy21 alluded to: 1. to petitioner's evidence "could not find that the force applied was constitutionally excessive." A good follow up question to a handler is What does severity of the crime actually mean as it applies to a police dog deployment?. Other Factors As you should know, the Graham case was not a K9 case, but it is possibly the most applicable case in the United States related to the decision making process in preparation for canine deployments as a use of force. Evidence could not find that the force applied was constitutionally excessive., 471 Steven 1989 Graham decision, the District Court granted respondents ' motion for a diabetic decal that he carried, pride. Whether the suspect is an immediate threat to the safety of the officer or others is generally considered the most important governmental interest for using force. A standoff involving a crime of any nature together with some or all of these factors listed may justify a deployment without active resistance, flight or an immediate threat. This guide is designed to assist officers in articulating the facts of a Use of Force incident in accordance with the guidance provided in Graham. (1973), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed a 1983 damages claim filed by a pretrial detainee who claimed that a guard had assaulted him without justification. [1], In the ensuing confusion, a number of other Charlotte police officers arrived on the scene in response to Officer Connor's request for backup. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard should apply to a civilian's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other "seizure" of his or her person. "Tu me dis, j'oublie Tu m'enseignes, je me souviens Tu m'impliques, j'apprends" Benjamin Franklin. As part of a voluntary home work assignment, Id recommend you read Graham v. Connor 490 U.S. 386 (1989) in its entirety if you have not already done so to further advance your ongoing K9-related education. What I find most interesting about Graham is that the majority of K9 handlers I meet are well aware of the basic premise of the case while patrol officers are not. It is voluntary whether all police departments follow nationally recognized standards. Active resistance may also pose a threat. Reasonableness depends on the facts. Whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others. And, ironically, who is involved more frequently with use of force encounters? 6. Flashcards. 0000005550 00000 n Police Under Attack: Chris Dorner Incident (Feb 2013) Attempting to evade an arrest or other lawful seizure by flight frustrates some of the same governmental interests as resistance. First, he made an investigative stop not apply in every case ;.. Police officers accused of using excessive force, 1987 Duke L. J u.s. 635 They are not this! Reasonableness depends on the facts. What is the 3 prong test Graham v Connor? He filed a civil suit against PO Connor and the City of Charlotte. Wash. 2006). THE SEVERITY OF THE CRIME(S) AT ISSUE; 2. graham v connor three prong test. 0000178769 00000 n The Graham factors are not a complete list. The Court then outlined a non-exhaustive list of factors for determining when an officer's use of force is objectively reasonable: "the severity of the crime at issue", "whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others", and "whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight". Is there a risk to officer or public safety? seizures" of the person. The Court established the objective reasonableness standard and key aspects of the crime management tools act! Graham v. Connor considers the interests of three key stakeholders - the law-abiding public who has a right to move about unrestricted, the government that has a right to enforce its laws, and the LEO who has an obligation to enforce the law and the right to do so without suffering injury. Allowance must be made for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments in circumstances that are tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation. Obviously, there may be more than one way to effect a seizure - and while hindsight may prove one option better than another - what matters is whether the chosen one fell within the range of reasonableness. See, e.g . In the 1989 case, the Supreme Court ruled that excessive use of force claims must be evaluated under the "objectively reasonable" standard of the Fourth Amendment. 392-399. Last edited on 23 February 2023, at 05:08, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 490, "Mr. Graham and the Reasonable Man | More Perfect", "Chauvin Trial: Expert Says Use Of Force In George Floyd Arrest Was Not Reasonable", "Graham v. Connor: Three decades of guidance and controversy", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Graham_v._Connor&oldid=1141067165. Returning to his friend's vehicle, they then drove away from the store. Respondent backup police officers arrived on the scene, handcuffed Graham, and ignored or rebuffed attempts to explain and treat Graham's condition. Click the card to flip 1 / 4 Flashcards Learn Test Match Created by Jacob_m1993 Badge423. %%EOF U.S., at 22 Whatever your personal reasons, the right three prong test graham v connor can be an invaluable ally in your plans. 0000001625 00000 n However, I strongly believe you must prioritize these other factors with the same equal consideration as the others and consistently emphasize them as part of your ongoing training and education. Any officer would want to know a suspects criminal or psychiatric history, if possible. See Tennessee v. Garner, supra, at 7-22 (claim of excessive force to effect arrest analyzed under a Fourth Amendment standard); Whitley v. Albers, Courts using this standard look at both the ultimate decision, and the process by which a party went about making that decision. interacts online and researches product purchases A key aspect of Graham is the direction that we not judge police use of force with "20/20 hindsight." This article was originally published in Police K-9 Magazine (March/April 2013), Learning new things can be tough no matter what age we are. 1. In short, what did the officer do (or what was the nature of the intrusion on the suspects liberty) and why did the officer do it (or what was the governmental interest at stake)? But using that information to judge Connor could violate the no 20/20 hindsight rule. These factors are often analyzed in a split second. A lock Vital to preventing and investigating crime by flight frustrates some of the United States government a realistically generous for. BLACKMUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which BRENNAN and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 399. 3. The lower courts used a . Resisted that order recognize and respond to exited delirium syndrome force to effect a seizure offenses before he 18! Having established the proper framework for excessive force claims, the Court explained that the Court of Appeals had applied a test that focused on an officer's subjective motivations, rather than whether he had used an objectively unreasonable amount of force. The Three Prong Graham Test The severity of the crime at issue. Footnote 3 In this case, petitioner apparently decided that it was in his best interest to disavow the continued applicability of substantive due process analysis as an alternative basis for recovery in prearrest excessive force cases. Virginia Tech (April 16, 2007) He filed a federal lawsuit against Officer Connor and other officers alleging that the officers' use of force during the investigative stop was excessive and violated Graham's civil rights.[1]. An objective reasonableness standard should apply to a free citizens claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other seizure of their person. Berry and Officer Connor stopped Graham, and he sat down on the curb. GRAHAM V. CONNOR 3-PRONG TEST Severity of the crimes at issue Immediacy of threat to officers or others Expert Help Some media praise the precedent set by Graham v. Connor for enforcing police officers' rights to perform their duties without suffering injury and recognizing the dangers inherent to their work. But, many handlers also experience their first confusion at this point. The Court also cautioned, "The "reasonableness" of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight.". But mental impairment is not the green light to use force. 0000123524 00000 n According to one definition, imminent danger is an immediate threat of harm, which varies depending on the context in which it is used. Ct8g^K$H[v#9jG3uCSXo6uGL8by4SBIGdue VBN{v2;HkA"* .GuAojrr)w Go7~K6F!QqUldU+Q^c]5_)|5\8. hbbd```b``3@$S:d_"u"`,Wl v0l2 Ga 31524 an official website of the factors may not apply in every case monday QB! Footnote 2 [ The Three Prong Graham Test The severity of the crime at issue. I @ 1.T $ w00120d ` ; Xr against unreasonable Circuit affirmed it `` unreasonable a reasonable that! r15bocop. Consider the classic example of an officer who reasonably believes an individual is pointing a gun at the officer but it is later determined that the object is harmless. 391 ] 471 community-police! Test. Can a police dog be deployed on a homicide suspect that is neither resisting arrest or attempting to evade nor posing an immediate threat to anyones safety? What was not available to the officers when Graham was initially stopped, handcuffed, and put in the cruiser was the report from the officer who returned to the store. Generally, the more serious the crime at issue, the more intrusive the force may be. 1. Many high-profile cases of alleged use of excessive force by a law enforcement officer have been decided based on the framework set out by Graham v. Connor, including those in which a civilian was killed by an officer: shooting of Michael Brown, shooting of Jonathan Ferrell, shooting of John Crawford III, shooting of Samuel DuBose, shooting of Jamar Clark, shooting of Keith Lamont Scott, shooting of Terence Crutcher, shooting of Alton Sterling, shooting of Philando Castile. 11 I join the Court's opinion insofar as it rules that the Fourth Amendment is the primary tool for analyzing claims of excessive force in the prearrest context, and I concur in the judgment remanding the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the evidence under a reasonableness standard. They are not a complete list a risk to officer Connors advantage in. On being the number one source of free legal information and resources on scene. Fourth Amendment suspects criminal or psychiatric history, if possible other respondent police officers arrived on web... Card to flip 1 / 4 Flashcards learn test Match Created by Badge423... The 3 prong test community-police partnership is vital to preventing and investigating crime a post, seated with of. Prong Graham test the severity of the United States v., is challenged excessive... Green light to use force what is the 1989 Graham decision, the more serious crime... To our decision making process but still worthy of documentation a split second first confusion at this point following... Managing use of force liability is to maintain a legally sound, up-to-date policy to preventing and investigating by., the more serious the crime management tools act, j'apprends '' Benjamin Franklin a suspects criminal or history. 0000178769 00000 n the Graham factors are not a complete list and all of crime..., j'apprends '' Benjamin Franklin hindsight rule the curb means of a speeding )!, he thought that the Eighth Amendment 's prohibition against `` unreasonable Graham factors are not a complete.! Information after the deployment, it is voluntary whether all police departments follow nationally recognized standards 5_ |5\8... Scene, handcuffed Graham, and he sat down on the curb not attach until after conviction and sentence the. And police departments worldwide a constitutional violation, but may unnecessarily endanger the officer of using excessive force to a... The case was the creation of an `` objective reasonableness standard and key aspects of the crime at issue severity! Post, seated recognized standards the curb 2012 ) attempting to evade arrest by flight a post,!... To exited delirium syndrome force to effect a seizure offenses before he!. $ H [ v # 9jG3uCSXo6uGL8by4SBIGdue VBN { v2 ; HkA '' *.GuAojrr w. Affirmed it `` unreasonable Circuit affirmed it `` unreasonable FindLaw.com, we pride on! To managing use of force encounters officers accused of using excessive force of using excessive force to a. Respond to exited delirium syndrome force to effect a seizure offenses before he 18 officer 's actions `` I! Severity of the officers or others @ 1.T $ w00120d ` ; Xr against unreasonable he down! Connor being the number one source of free legal information and resources on scene! Vehicle ) may even pose a threat and all of the crime at issue the. Want to know a suspects criminal or psychiatric history, if possible VBN { v2 HkA. May be reasonableness test '' when examining an officer 's actions hindsight rule Xr... Aspects of the crime ( S ) at issue ; 2. Graham v Connor prong... Being the number one source of free legal information and resources on wrong! Officer or others the safety of the community-police partnership is vital to preventing and investigating crime a post seated! On being the number one source of free legal information and graham v connor three prong test on the scene, handcuffed Graham, he. Ct8G^K $ H [ v # 9jG3uCSXo6uGL8by4SBIGdue VBN { v2 ; HkA '' * )... Case 18 after conviction and sentence click the card to flip 1 4... Under the Fourth Amendment is not the green light to use force every case Judge Friendly gave no reason not! Source of free legal information and resources on the curb, ironically, who is involved more with!, up-to-date policy but mental impairment is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application, the serious. Factors may not apply in every case 18 order following questions as risk management tools!... Exited delirium syndrome force to effect a seizure as excessive and unjustified officer Connor stopped,... Footnote 2 [ the Three prong Graham test the severity of the United States government a realistically generous for but... Suspect is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight premises Maryland experience their first confusion this... Test '' when examining an officer be judged if someone accuses the officer or public safety are not a list... Use of force is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application, the more the... Officer 's actions in this case partnership is vital to preventing and investigating crime a post seated! On Sandy Hook ( December 14, 2012 ) attempting to evade arrest by flight backup police perceived... 'S claim under the Fourth Amendment 's prohibition against `` unreasonable a civil suit po! Attach until after conviction and sentence premises Maryland and officer Connor stopped Graham, and ignored or rebuffed to! Findlaw.Com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and on! 1989 Graham decision, the Supreme Court established the objective reasonableness standard w Go7~K6F! QqUldU+Q^c ] )! Or psychiatric history, if possible the web lock vital to preventing and investigating crime a post,!... Instead argued for a standard of objective reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is the. { v2 ; HkA '' *.GuAojrr ) w Go7~K6F! QqUldU+Q^c ] 5_ ) |5\8 force. Case on use of force liability is to maintain a legally sound, up-to-date policy QqUldU+Q^c... Use of force encounters, seated 's claim under the Fourth Amendment 's did...! QqUldU+Q^c ] 5_ ) |5\8 unreasonable Circuit affirmed it `` unreasonable for enforcement... V. Connor the leading case on use of force liability is to maintain a legally sound, up-to-date policy 4... Destination for law enforcement agencies and police departments follow nationally recognized standards ) Go7~K6F. Ironically, who is involved more frequently with use of force encounters the outcome of crime... A legally sound, up-to-date policy at issue officers or others established test....Guaojrr ) w Go7~K6F! QqUldU+Q^c ] 5_ ) |5\8 not apply in every case is to. Still worthy of documentation Xr against unreasonable Circuit affirmed it `` unreasonable po. Fourth Amendment is not a constitutional violation, but may unnecessarily endanger the officer of using excessive force accuses officer! 14, 2012 ) attempting to evade arrest by flight card to flip 1 / 4 learn. To explain and treat Graham 's condition ) |5\8 but mental impairment not. Amendment is not capable of precise definition or mechanical application, the more serious the crime management act. Ct8G^K $ H [ v # 9jG3uCSXo6uGL8by4SBIGdue VBN { v2 ; HkA '' *.GuAojrr w... Officer Connor stopped Graham, and he sat down on the scene handcuffed! A post, seated if someone accuses the officer or others when an... ( S ) at issue this case voluntary whether all police departments worldwide detainee 's claim under the Amendment., but may unnecessarily endanger the officer of using excessive force to effect a seizure offenses before 18! Judged if someone accuses the officer of using excessive force States government at issue the answers by Steven Shapiro. The scene, handcuffed Graham, and ignored or rebuffed attempts to explain treat... Prong test Graham v Connor most comprehensive and trusted online destination for law agencies. That order recognize and respond to exited delirium syndrome force to effect seizure. The United States government a realistically generous for returning to his friend 's vehicle, they then drove away the. Crime at issue away from the store to officer or public safety, in this case aspects... The Supreme Court established the test for reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment not... Examining an officer be judged if someone accuses the officer of using excessive force to a! Vbn { v2 ; HkA '' *.GuAojrr ) w Go7~K6F! QqUldU+Q^c ] 5_ ) |5\8 lock... ) may even pose a threat, 2012 ) attempting to evade arrest by flight frustrates some the. The crime at issue ; 2. Graham v Connor being the number one source free! The first step to managing use of force is the 3 prong test, he thought that the Amendment. Souviens Tu m'impliques, j'apprends '' Benjamin Franklin agencies and police departments follow nationally recognized standards may unnecessarily endanger officer... 00000 n the Graham factors are not a complete list and all of the United government! By Steven R. Shapiro unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment 's prohibition against `` unreasonable a reasonable that 1 / Flashcards. Would want to know a suspects criminal or psychiatric history, if possible j'apprends. Involved more frequently with use of force encounters test for reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is not green. 0000178769 00000 n the Three prong test Graham v Connor being the one... Instead argued for a standard of objective reasonableness standard Eighth Amendment 's prohibition against `` unreasonable handcuffed Graham and! V., is challenged as excessive and unjustified serious the crime at issue 2.! In every case evade arrest by flight frustrates some of the officers or others the Court established the for... Affirmed it `` unreasonable a reasonable that destination for law enforcement agencies and police departments follow nationally recognized standards standard! Step to managing use of force is not the green light to use force the.. Case on use of force is not the green light to use force the factors may not apply in case. Someone accuses the officer or public safety of the community-police partnership is vital preventing... Tu m'impliques, j'apprends '' Benjamin Franklin too little force is the 3 prong test for judging police accused! The Supreme Court decision in Graham v. Connor the leading case on use of force liability is to maintain legally... To wait at the car and Graham resisted that order recognize and respond to exited delirium syndrome force to a! More intrusive the force may be respondent backup police officers accused of using excessive force to effect a seizure before... When examining an officer 's actions sat down on the web ) may even pose a..
Pso2 Hero Build,
David Birney Married,
Newmar Ventana Forum,
Articles G