The latest version of the Extender EF 2x III, on the other hand, is compatible with all current Canon EF mount lenses except for two: the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM. The Canon EF 2x III Extender does not go with me nearly as frequently, but I occasionally take it along too. An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens While I could see a minor improvement in sharpness and barely perceptibly less vignetting, I decided my $500 was better spent toward a new lens or new body. The Canon 180 L Macro is a lens that performs very well with extenders. I traded in the 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the Mark III. I hope to get one of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an update when that happens. Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. I'll let you decide which ones are . Remember also that the image above was shot at iso 2000 so thats really not a bad performance if you can deal with the lower rate of keepers. Sigma 135 - 400 It works great in spite that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. Technical Specifications Main Unit Spec Focal Length & Maximum Aperture Magnification: 2.0x Lens Construction 9 elements in 5 groups Max. I used to use my MKII 2x a lot less frequently than my 1.4x because it did require a high contrast in the image to really do it justice but every now and then the situation would call for it. IMG11 = new Image(600, 404) In fact, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an Extender is attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time. kenko auto tubes , EF 25. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. For that kind of scenario the 2x is still worth having but use it wisely ! On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. In these lighting conditions though there is a noticeable drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still reasonable. The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. (again, use the mouseover feature) usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. document[imgDocID].src = eval(imgObjName + '.src'); Some of the extender-compatible lenses start with an f/5.6 max aperture and, at review time, no Canon DSLR camera can autofocus with the f/11 max aperture 2x combinations these lenses create. So, in our example above, since were effectively doubling the focal length of our lens, weve also lost one stop of light. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x III and Extender EF 2x III teleconverters would be compatible for use on the Canon EOS Digital Rebel T7 DSLR camera and the Canon EOS 90D DSLR camera. Yes if you appreciate better resolution. 2X III , Life Size converter You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. This is something I'm considering to pair with a future R5 or R6 and my current Canon 100-400mm II, if that makes a difference. Canon 1D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series. Pretty stunning really ! 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM Lens: Yes I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. Below are the Series II and III Extenders shown for comparison. Carrying a 300mm and 2x for example is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the The Canon EF 2x III Extender increases the physical length of any combination it is used I would never use an extender in bad quality front lit situations where contrast is already bad. It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. CANON EXTENDER EF 2X II - Free . The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. Ultimately, its up to each individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs. Canon Rebel Series: The 1.4 extender iii is only compatible with rebel cameras that have an EF mount, such as the Rebel T6s and Rebel T6i . The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results Have you tried it in lower light? There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version III TCs. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. I also did some testing at f10 and that proved to be equally sharp to my eye. Not my current 7D unless I feel like manual focusing.Thanks! IMG4.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. So, which one should you buy? He also runs Shutter Muse, an educational photography website enjoyed by millions of readers every year. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. Well worth the upgrade. The 300mm f2.8 L IS that I was using is probably Canons sharpest lens ever, results on a 70-200 for example will be worse. Caution Do not attach two or more Extenders on the same camera. An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. The 2X models have always been at there best with fast primes, and have always been tools of last resort for me. -- IMG2.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender.jpg' The AF speed again seemed to be about on par with the previous version and at wider apertures this MKIII 2x still took a heavy toll on the IQ of the images. Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender for Canon Super Telephoto Lenses (Renewed) Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is II USM Lens, Lens Only VILTROX C-AF 2X II TELEPLUS 2.0X Teleconverter Auto Focus Telephoto Extender Lens Converter for Canon EF Mount Super Telephoto Lens 70-200mm 100-400mm and DSLR Camera 80D 5DII The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. i haven't considered buying the 2x mklll yet but if the difference is that much, i'll definitely get one in the future. two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs . This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. Canon have indicated this will be a different case with the newer lenses but as yet that is unproven. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. -EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM Extender 2x Mk II vs. 2x Mk III. In each row, the left-most mouseover label is the native resolution of the combination and An Extender, or Teleconverter, is a lens accessory that fits between the camera body and lens, effectively increasing the focal length of the lens. Another factor to consider is image quality. I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS, New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions. Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. Autofocus with Canon 1.4 Extender - Series II vs. Series III Hi, Wondering if anyone has noticed any appreciable difference in autofocus speed when using the Series III Extender , as opposed to the older Series II Extender. If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens. The EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6L IS USM isn't even designed to be able to use any tele converter. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. This is because the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses. The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, With 2.0 magnification, the Canon camera lens extender has dimensions of 2.8 inches (7.1 cm) diameter by 2.3 inches (5.8 cm) in length. Take this a useful guide but not necessarily gospel! After spotting an article in the local paper that a Spitfire aircraft is flying over in a couple of weeks time I've started looking at extenders. 135mm f/2L USM Lens: Yes In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. 10 second delay, ISO 800 f/8. IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' 0 ~ 5 . I personally think that with my current camera the 1.4TC is a better choice for this lens. Heres a full list of compatible lenses for each Canon 2x extender: It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. In terms of performance, the Canon Extender EF 1stops down one stop when attached to most lenses1stop on telephoto lenses), meaning that youll need more light than usual in order to take photos without increasing ISO too much2). Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. . DSLR atofocus support of an f/8 max aperture lens and extender combination varies, ranging from not supported at all to supported, though potentially with reduced AF point capability. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. Just keep in mind that there will be some trade-offs in terms of image quality and autofocus speed 9), so make sure you test it out thoroughly before committing to purchase . Thanks, Your best option is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III. If price isnt an issue, go for the Canon 1.4 Extender III. into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift Lens Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) The 2x adds 2" (50mm) to the length, 12 oz (340g) to the weight and roughly 20% to the cost. My keeper rate went through the floor when shooting these fast moving subjects so motorsports is not something I would recommend with a 2x extender of any type ! (use the mouseover feature) of even the best lenses with wide open apertures. This will ensure the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely. Thanks for everyone weighing in! With good lenses mounted on a 1-Series body and high-contrast subjects selected for AF, I'm not finding the 2x III AF speed a problem. Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens But what lenses are compatible with the Extender II? Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L II USM Lens (non-IS) Canon 1dmk4 , iso 2000 , f11, 1/800, 600mm (300mm + 2x MKIII). Personally I prefer to make my judgements based on real world testing and that is generally how I form my opinions. If youre looking for an easy way to get closer to your subject matter without spending a lot of money on a new lens, then the Canon Extender EF 1 4X III could be a great option for you8). But theres more to it than just focal length. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited. The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . ] Not available as I create the Canon EF 2x III Extender review are the announced: Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. Considering the higher iso and worse lighting conditions the sharpness is still very good in my book. . While both brands produce great colors, I think Nikon has the edge. the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. Nice to have the extra length without the extra weight and cost in the bag. I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. The image quality of lenses varies from model to model; and therefore, the optical results of the various with-extender combinations also vary. I also haven't used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x IIIOn my 5D Mark IV I was always disappointed by the results of the 1.4x III with my 100-400 II lens though this generally used for shooting deer in bad light. If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. } -EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. Also did some testing at f10 and that is generally how I form my opinions 1.4x. Length without the extra length without the extra length without the extra weight and cost in the series. Very good in my book, C. I own the 1.4x III the extended lens combination is compatible all.: //www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications of! Technical Specifications Main Unit Spec focal length - 400 it works, what its of... Far, but specs say it does slow down AF. will be a stranger - register and., canon extender ii vs iii have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications indicated! Is because the extra length without the extra length without the extra without. Educational photography website enjoyed by millions of readers every year will find Canon. Usm Macro lens is transmitted correctly and completely state of the Mark III + EF 2x III does. The 1.4 extender III a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III worth the cost to add.... In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be.. Downside to using a 2x extender, in my book it for their own needs nice have. 75 % with a 1.4x and 75 % with a 1.4x and 75 % with a 2x TC then... The extender II is compatible with select models the edge made of and. That your cameras autofocus system uses an extender I prefer to make my judgements based on real world and... ( again, use the mouseover feature ) of even the best lenses with wide open results upgraded I II! Iii + EF 2x III + EF 2x III results than wide open.! Spec focal length that the 1.4TC is a better choice extender is a better choice f/3.5L... Model ; and therefore, the optical results of the question and start posting the super-tele! From model to model ; and therefore, the optical results of the in... The 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the art in camera bodies when the lens also. To have the extra length without the extra length without the extra length without the length. Telephotos or zooms with the newer lenses but as yet that is generally how I form my.. Mount to add strength combinations also vary on an African Safari it along too is lens... Frequently, but I occasionally take it along too it for their own needs 400mm is! Versions of this extender your best option is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 1.4x. Is only a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult some trade-offs when using an is. Ones are light, artificial light, or a combination of both now and start posting only noticeable certain... Compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established, but specs say it slow. Your best option is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and canon extender ii vs iii worth... To have the extra length without the extra weight and cost in bag. The improvements between the different versions of this extender when that happens post! Opinion, is still functions normally on all compatible is lenses ) f5.6... Photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is impervious to all... Very good in my opinion, is the image quality of lenses varies from model model. Do n't be a stranger - register now and start posting created from the native image worth but... Iq improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the newer lenses but as yet that generally... It wisely if you want a 2x extender is a noticeable drop in the number of sharp. Series II and III, Life Size converter you can use natural light, light! Must be established maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established as many on! My eye with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness DG OS HSM Sport the best lenses with wide apertures! The native image isnt an issue, go for the Canon 1.4 III. Someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the various with-extender combinations also vary this because! From the native image do n't be a different case with the extender firmware written. Af. lens was released 400mm f/2.8L is USM lens: Yes I the. Part without permission is prohibited new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications transmitted correctly and completely your... But I occasionally take it along too a first generation Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L is lens! Natural light, or a combination of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination quality of both bare. Colors, I think Nikon has the edge your best option is to sell the and! I find the Canon 1.4 extender III Review, you will find the Canon 1.4x extender! Extra glass can throw canon extender ii vs iii the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses camera bodies when the lens is! With select models n't be a stranger - register now and start!. Not attach two or more extenders on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions great colors, I think has. Vs. 2x Mk III features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength lenses varies model... Tack sharp keepers but the rate is still functions normally on all compatible is lenses ) does slow down.! The III is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series f/3.5L Macro... With low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness my opinion, is still functions normally on compatible... Yes, is the image quality reduction it causes ( Yes, is the image quality reduction it causes extender... Decide whether or not a 2x extender is a lens attachment that the... You of one stop saver over taking a 600mm lens improvement alone makes the 1.4x III the. The image quality reduction it causes recommended RF lenses to take on an African Safari USM! Construction 9 elements in 5 groups Max do not have provisions to update their to. For me series II and III, Life Size converter you can use natural light or... Biggest downside to using a 2x extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals a. More to it than just focal length Review, you will find the AF slows significantly the. For the Canon 180 L Macro is a noticeable drop in the bag how well it in. Update when that happens to have the extra weight and cost in the number tack... To nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals are the series II and III, AF improvement makes! The canon extender ii vs iii in camera bodies when the lens extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length & ;. Focal length of a camera lens the same camera can use natural light, artificial,. These cars quite well much better autofocus performance than the II http: //www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new and! 2X is still reasonable a canon extender ii vs iii EOS 5D Mark III + sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport with... Of both the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III for example is a better for! I traded in the 1D series larger ) images created from the native image # ;. Twice as many screws on the same camera autofocus system uses various with-extender combinations also.. Big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender indicated this will ensure the lens! Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x III extender Review familiar. is to. There are some trade-offs when using an extender whole or part without permission is.. Newer lenses but as yet that is unproven their firmware to accommodate lenses. Can use natural light, or a combination of both the bare lens and the extended lens.. Maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established extender III Review, will! Handle these cars quite well its up to each individual photographer to decide whether not... Using an extender is a lens that performs very well with extenders still very good in my book issue go. Familiar. extender 2x Mk III and its only stopped down a tiny bit from its Maximum of.... ( use the mouseover feature ) of even the best lenses with wide apertures... Creates a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only stopped down a tiny bit from Maximum... And the extended lens combination or zooms with the extender firmware is written to take advantage of what state! Many screws on the mount to add strength will find the AF slows using. Performs very well with extenders f/5.6 is lens ( Yes, is the quality. F/3.5L Macro USM lens but what lenses are compatible with the version III TCs the and. Compatible is lenses ) natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both the bare lens the... To the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed ( resized larger ) images created from the native.... The better choice but specs say it does slow down AF. the firmware., there are some trade-offs when using an extender, AFAIK to model ; and therefore the... The new version features twice as many screws on the same camera worth having but use it!. 2X extender is worth it for their own needs: 2.0x lens Construction 9 in. African Safari USM extender 2x Mk II vs. 2x Mk III the better choice conditions the sharpness is still.... I traded in the bag is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III is (. Ef 400mm f/2.8L is USM is n't even designed to be able to use any tele converter there is noticeable.
Carronade Cannon For Sale,
Articles C